Rogue nuclear states? Don’t worry — it’s not the end of the world
Quite the opposite, admit red-faced political historians
by Kieren McCarthy
Political historians have today apologised for twenty years of inaccurate
predictions regarding the end of the world.
Since 1982, every commentator worth his salt has steadfastly claimed that
the end of the world would result from a nuclear war started by from a small,
rogue country with new capabilities. Previous contenders have included Iran,
Iraq, Israel, India, Pakistan, China, and just about anywhere else in Asia.
However, in a grovelling apology issued today by the Society of Political
Pundits, the experts admitted they had been wrong all along. "It would appear
as though we have been skewed in our thinking for two decades," it states. "A
nuclear war, although still unlikely, will not be started by a 'rogue nation'
but by one of the large industrialised countries of the West, most likely the
US or Britain."
It explains: "While we have always believed the desire by a small country to
upset the status quo and use it as an opportunity to garner greater power would
be the start point of any Third World War, it now becomes clear that the
catalyst to such a catastrophic engagement would be the large democracies of
the world claiming to protect the world while really only attempting to cling
onto their own power."
The statement continues: "The world is growing more industrialised and as
smaller countries start to gain in confidence and take advantage of their lower
manufacturing costs, the traditionally more powerful countries in the West have
seem their influence slowly eroded.
"Such countries have been attempting to enforce their controls on these
countries and this is now stirring up resentment within those countries
themselves. However, while this is nothing new, we had up until now completely
underestimated the willingness of the large countries to start unjustified wars
to entrench their position.
"Our main flaw was to believe in the stabilising influence that democracy
would have on any such authoritarian action. That it is our sole job in life to
learn lessons from the past, we feel must apologise for our oversight in this
respect.
"It only requires a group of like-minded individuals to install themselves
in power and democracy loses its ability to control their more extreme
intentions. We do not wish to draw parallels between Nazi Germany and George
Bush and Tony Blair, so we won't."