Washing powder giants get themselves in a lather
Not one gimmick left to punt soap to idiots
by Kieren McCarthy
The share prices of Unilever and Proctor & Gamble went into freefall this
morning as the companies announced that their list of ways in which to
reinvent the washing powder wheel contained just two remaining options.
Having run a comfortable duopoly for the last 40 years, the news that both
companies had been unable to come up with a different way of making people
pay more for the same thing left institutional investors panicking.
"This is a nightmare," one investor told us. "I thought they'd have at
least another twenty different ways of coating clothes in a washing machine
with cleaning powder. Their share price has rested almost entirely on
bringing out a new one every five months, charging more for it, and then
phasing out the previous format. But when you look at it, they have pretty
much covered everything."
To make matters worse, the original writer of the format list, one Arthur
Matthews, died aged 93 last year on a Caribbean island while seeing to one
of his 134 girlfriends, former Miss Jamaica Tanya Fukyfuky.
Mr Matthews was reportedly paid £32 billion in 1986 to produce a
list of feasible alternatives to simple washing powder after Unilever and
Procter & Gamble discovered that soap can only be improved to a certain
point before it just becomes really good soap.
It is thanks to Mr Matthews that the plastic ball for liquid washing powder
was introduced (number eight on the list). That was carefully introduced after
the fabric-bottomed ball's deficiencies had become well known. He was also
responsible for super-concentrated powder, the two-coloured washing block and
its derivatives, eco-friendly washing powder and direct-application washing
liquid.
But with the companies introducing item number 16 — the "capsule"
consisting of washing liquid contained in a plastic container that dissolves
in water ("no scoop, no ball, no mess") — they were forced to admit
that only two different formats remain before they are forced to go back to
common-or-garden powder that you pour into a slot on the top of the
machine.
"We've tried everything," the CEO of Unilever told us. "But after six
months of research, creative think-tanks, primal scream therapy and £850
million all we came up with was labelling powder 'Original' and going through
the list a second time hoping no one would notice. It was time to come clean,
so to speak."
But while the City and big bosses were decrying the loss of another great
British industry built on the stupidity of the common man, the common man or
rather single mother was delighted by the news. "That means I can afford to
buy an extra 80 fags a week," one slapper told us when it was revealed the
cost of a box of washing powder would fall from £4.50 to just 32p from
January next year. "I might even get me hair done on that."