The original is at http://www.therockalltimes.co.uk/2006/02/13/meadow-appeal.html. Professor Roy Meadow questions his own existenceMother's Ruin launches appeal against GMC decision by Roger Freely, medical correspondent Professor Sir Roy Meadow, the paediatrician catapulted to derision on the basis of his flawed "expert" evidence at the trials of Sally Clark and other mothers wrongly convicted of the murder of their babies, is to appeal in the High Court against the General Medical Council's decision to erase him from the medical register.
"If you also take into account that, on a population-based average, only 10 per cent of ejaculations actually take place in the presence of a second person and that only 10 per cent of these ejaculations are directed up the business end, the odds become something like 1 in 10 billion." In what is widely expected to become known in legal circles as the "Meadow's Defence", Sir Roy's legal team will argue that it is illogical for the GMC to apportion blame to someone who, from a statistical viewpoint, is probably somebody else. "In constructing this defence strategy we have relied heavily on a little known highly specialised branch of philosophy called Yeast Logic™," said a spokesman. A spokeswoman for the Royal Statistical Society said that she was astounded by the bizarre logic behind the proposed appeal: "The probability that Sir Roy is himself is close to one. In actual fact, it is one." In a NotMeGov™ poll commissioned by The Rockall Times, 500 clinicians confirmed that they would consider using the Meadow's Defence if they ever ended up in shi*t creek with the GMC. Previously
| ||||||